• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

TinyGrab

Your Trusted Source for Tech, Finance & Brand Advice

  • Personal Finance
  • Tech & Social
  • Brands
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Get In Touch
  • About Us
Home » Why did LinkedIn become so weird?

Why did LinkedIn become so weird?

May 23, 2025 by TinyGrab Team Leave a Comment

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • Why Did LinkedIn Become So Weird? The Unvarnished Truth
    • The Great Transformation: From Résumé Repository to Content Mill
      • The Rise of the “LinkedIn Influencer”
      • The Algorithmic Echo Chamber
      • The Monetization Push and the Pressure to “Be a Brand”
    • The Culprits Behind the Weirdness: A Deeper Dive
      • The Performative Authenticity Paradox
      • The Blurring of Professional Boundaries
      • The Comment Section Carnage
      • The Rise of the “Broetry” and the Content Apocalypse
    • The Path Forward: Can LinkedIn Be Saved?
    • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About “Weird LinkedIn”
      • 1. What exactly defines “Weird LinkedIn”?
      • 2. Is all content on LinkedIn “weird”?
      • 3. Why do people post such strange things on LinkedIn?
      • 4. Is LinkedIn becoming more like Facebook or Instagram?
      • 5. How does the LinkedIn algorithm contribute to the problem?
      • 6. What can I do to avoid seeing “Weird LinkedIn” content?
      • 7. Is there any value left on LinkedIn?
      • 8. Is LinkedIn actively trying to fix the problem?
      • 9. Is “Weird LinkedIn” just a generational thing? Are older users complaining about younger users?
      • 10. Is posting personal stories on LinkedIn always inappropriate?
      • 11. How can I create engaging content without contributing to the “Weird LinkedIn” problem?
      • 12. Will LinkedIn ever go back to being a straightforward professional networking platform?

Why Did LinkedIn Become So Weird? The Unvarnished Truth

Let’s cut to the chase. LinkedIn became “weird” because it underwent a fundamental identity crisis. Originally a straightforward platform for professional networking and job searching, it succumbed to the siren song of engagement metrics and content creation driven by a desperate need to mimic the success of social media giants like Facebook and Instagram. This, coupled with a lack of strong moderation, algorithm changes that prioritize sensationalism, and the influx of users seeking personal validation rather than professional advancement, created the Frankenstein’s monster we know today. Now, let’s dissect how this happened.

The Great Transformation: From Résumé Repository to Content Mill

The Rise of the “LinkedIn Influencer”

The initial shift began with LinkedIn encouraging users to share more than just their work experience. The intent was noble – to foster thought leadership and build communities. However, this opened the floodgates to the “LinkedIn Influencer” phenomenon. Suddenly, everyone was a guru, sharing platitudes about hustle culture, productivity hacks (often recycled and devoid of real-world application), and painfully crafted narratives about overcoming adversity. The sheer volume of this content overwhelmed the platform, burying genuine professional insights beneath a mountain of motivational spam.

The Algorithmic Echo Chamber

LinkedIn’s algorithm, like many others, prioritizes content that generates high engagement. This meant that controversial, emotional, and often performative posts were rewarded, while nuanced discussions and factual information got lost in the shuffle. This created an echo chamber effect, where users were primarily exposed to content that reinforced existing biases and encouraged increasingly outrageous behavior in pursuit of those coveted likes and comments.

The Monetization Push and the Pressure to “Be a Brand”

LinkedIn, understandably, wanted to monetize its platform. This led to the promotion of features like LinkedIn Learning and the encouragement of paid content. However, it also fostered an environment where users felt pressured to “be a brand”, constantly promoting themselves and their services. This created a culture of aggressive self-promotion, often disguised as helpful advice or valuable content.

The Culprits Behind the Weirdness: A Deeper Dive

The Performative Authenticity Paradox

One of the most jarring aspects of “Weird LinkedIn” is the performative authenticity. Users strive to appear genuine and relatable while simultaneously crafting a highly curated and often exaggerated version of their lives and careers. This creates a sense of dissonance, where it’s difficult to discern genuine insights from carefully constructed narratives designed to elicit sympathy or admiration.

The Blurring of Professional Boundaries

The lines between professional and personal life have become increasingly blurred on LinkedIn. Users share deeply personal stories, often unrelated to their work, in an attempt to connect with their audience on an emotional level. While vulnerability can be a valuable asset, the over-sharing of personal trauma and the blatant attempts to leverage personal hardships for professional gain have become commonplace and, frankly, disturbing.

The Comment Section Carnage

The comment sections on LinkedIn have become a battleground for keyboard warriors and virtue signalers. Disagreements quickly escalate into personal attacks, and the level of discourse often resembles a poorly moderated online forum. The lack of effective moderation and the prevalence of anonymous profiles contribute to this toxic environment.

The Rise of the “Broetry” and the Content Apocalypse

The proliferation of poorly written, overly sentimental, and grammatically challenged content, often referred to as “broetry,” has become a defining characteristic of “Weird LinkedIn.” This content, often featuring cheesy stock photos and trite platitudes, somehow manages to garner significant engagement, further incentivizing its creation and perpetuating the cycle of weirdness. The sheer volume of this low-quality content has created a content apocalypse, drowning out valuable insights and making it increasingly difficult to find relevant information.

The Path Forward: Can LinkedIn Be Saved?

The future of LinkedIn remains uncertain. While the platform has taken some steps to address the issues outlined above, such as implementing stricter content moderation policies and tweaking the algorithm, the underlying problems remain. The key to restoring LinkedIn’s credibility lies in:

  • Prioritizing quality over quantity: Emphasizing insightful analysis and factual information over emotional narratives and sensationalism.
  • Strengthening content moderation: Actively removing spam, hate speech, and other forms of harmful content.
  • Encouraging respectful dialogue: Fostering a culture of constructive criticism and open-minded discussion.
  • Re-emphasizing the platform’s original purpose: Focusing on professional networking, job searching, and career development.

Whether LinkedIn can successfully navigate this path remains to be seen. However, one thing is clear: the platform needs to undergo a significant transformation if it hopes to shed its “weird” reputation and regain the trust of its users.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) About “Weird LinkedIn”

1. What exactly defines “Weird LinkedIn”?

“Weird LinkedIn” refers to the phenomenon of LinkedIn being overrun by overly personal, sensationalized, or downright bizarre content that deviates significantly from its original purpose as a professional networking platform. It includes performative posts, motivational spam, and questionable advice.

2. Is all content on LinkedIn “weird”?

No, of course not. There’s still valuable content to be found on LinkedIn, but it’s often buried beneath the noise of the “Weird LinkedIn” phenomenon. It often requires more filtering to find the genuine quality.

3. Why do people post such strange things on LinkedIn?

There are several reasons: the algorithm rewards engagement, people seek validation, they’re trying to build a personal brand, or they simply misunderstand the platform’s intended purpose.

4. Is LinkedIn becoming more like Facebook or Instagram?

Yes, LinkedIn is increasingly resembling other social media platforms, particularly in its emphasis on personal stories, visual content, and engagement metrics. This is part of the problem.

5. How does the LinkedIn algorithm contribute to the problem?

The algorithm prioritizes content that generates high engagement, which often means controversial, emotional, or sensationalized posts. This creates a feedback loop that incentivizes more of this type of content.

6. What can I do to avoid seeing “Weird LinkedIn” content?

You can unfollow or mute users who post content you find unhelpful or offensive, adjust your feed preferences to prioritize specific topics, and actively seek out high-quality content from trusted sources.

7. Is there any value left on LinkedIn?

Yes, absolutely. LinkedIn is still a valuable tool for job searching, networking, and staying informed about industry trends. The key is to be selective about the content you consume and the connections you make.

8. Is LinkedIn actively trying to fix the problem?

Yes, LinkedIn has implemented some measures to combat the problem, such as stricter content moderation policies and algorithm tweaks. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains to be seen.

9. Is “Weird LinkedIn” just a generational thing? Are older users complaining about younger users?

While there may be some generational differences in how people use LinkedIn, the “Weird LinkedIn” phenomenon transcends age. Users of all ages contribute to and are affected by the problem.

10. Is posting personal stories on LinkedIn always inappropriate?

Not necessarily. Sharing relevant personal experiences can be a valuable way to connect with others and build relationships. However, it’s important to exercise discretion and avoid over-sharing or exploiting personal trauma for professional gain.

11. How can I create engaging content without contributing to the “Weird LinkedIn” problem?

Focus on providing valuable insights, sharing your expertise, and fostering constructive discussions. Avoid sensationalism, clickbait, and overly personal stories.

12. Will LinkedIn ever go back to being a straightforward professional networking platform?

That’s unlikely. LinkedIn has evolved into a hybrid platform that combines professional networking with elements of social media. The challenge is to find a balance between these two aspects and prevent the latter from overwhelming the former.

Filed Under: Tech & Social

Previous Post: « How to remove apps from Google Chrome?
Next Post: How does Instagram know who to suggest? »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

NICE TO MEET YOU!

Welcome to TinyGrab! We are your trusted source of information, providing frequently asked questions (FAQs), guides, and helpful tips about technology, finance, and popular US brands. Learn more.

Copyright © 2025 · Tiny Grab